| |
In
the Labs
One only has
to read the story of James, the monkey looked after by Michelle Rokke
when she worked undercover in Huntingdon Life Sciences, to read a singularly
horrific story of the life of a lab animal. That poor creature lived out
his life in suffering and died at the hands of barbarians. His story was
far from unique.
To a vivisection lab, animals are just assets (in the words of one Oxford
University professor), and treated like any other bit of furniture. They
exist to be used and abused before being put down when their usefulness
is over. Their needs and suffering never come into the equation.
This does not mean that these animals come cheap. They cost a lot of money
and this is reflected in the amount of money pharmaceutical companies
pay out to have their poisons tested or university researchers apply for
in grants. This is further affected by the fact that there is currently
a strong demand for these animals, especially in primates where there
has been an acknowledged shortage for some time.

The closure
of Shamrock monkey farm and Hillgrove cat
farm both put strain on those experiments requiring
cats and primates.
Now we plan the biggest coup to date - to remove the
primates and other species from the labs altogether,
or to push the cost of obtaining them so
prohibitively high many research institutions will not
longer be able to afford them.
Knocking out the export of animals from Nepal and Mauritius will affect
the primate experiments worldwide. Places like Oxford University, GSK
Bio, Huntingdon Life Sciences, BPRC, Covance, Inveresk and Sequani will
also suffer.
Places such as the now aborted laboratory in Cambridge
would never have got off the ground. Pharmaceutical companies with their
own labs will not be able to carry out
their experiments and be left with scientists unable to do
their jobs on primates and other animals.
It is not
just those companies or institutions currently being targeted that will
feel the effect, but every single one of them as the ripples are felt.
Without access to these animals, all these organizations will be left
twiddling their thumbs or having to look into alternatives to using animals.
How will Covance in Harrogate or Huntingdon Life Sciences attract business
if they cannot even get the animals to experiment on?
How will Oxford University be able to put in grant applications to abuse
animals if the animals are too expensive, if they can be obtained at all.
If no animals are imported then primates such as James cannot be tortured
in the same way he was. Alternatives to animals will have to be found
and the industry will have been struck a devastating blow.

|
|
 |
 |