Shelter facilities centered on animal health and well-being can not only change the animals that live there, but also the many people who look after them and the residential areas they serve. Many organizations and other sponsors such as a window replacement company have a chance to build a shelter every 20 years, 30 years or more; therefore, the design must be correct.

The facility’s design can affect disease levels, animal behavioral health, staffing requirements, and daily care costs thus leaving the remaining time and money to other crucial projects. While good breeding could make up for a few of the shortcomings, poorly designed facilities can have an impact on employees and animals every day, raising tension and disease.

On the other hand, well-designed facilities provide the most efficient overall animal wellness. Additionally, it enables the flexibility to meet the evolving requirements of the society and the reforming objective in the organization. It can successfully respond to unfortunate occurrences and breakouts, and also new options including foster care, transfer, treatment solutions as well as education programs. If you want to provide customized insight into your enterprise, the UC Davis Koret Medical Program and the University of Wisconsin Medicine Program at this point provide facility design assessment.

Determining goals and objectives and gathering facts

Carefully clarify the objectives of the project when looking to build or expand existing facilities. Look at present and long term developments. A great way to begin is to brainstorm and understand the causes of the new building project.

• Will the new shelter allow animals to be more healthy and even more comfortable?
• Will the new facility be more effective and quicker to clean and care for?
• Will the facilities be used to educate the community or housing staff?
• Does the current architectural design have a place for special populations like for example puppies and kittens, animals that are sick, mothers and newborns waiting to be fostered?
• Is the facility going to work as a shelter, a rescue transfer, or both as a receiving and a source shelter?

These are just a few illustrations – naturally, the list of each shelter will vary according to the philosophy, methods and issues natural in that specific community.

After determining the target list, select the highest priority. Every single feasible expenditure in the brand-new facility must be intentionally regarded in a manner that is conducive to the highest priority. If it eventually ends up for which you can’t contain it all, will added adoption homes fulfill the goal of the shelter much better than the animal area or new treatment area waiting to be fostered or rescued? Is a huge, striking lobby or service area worthy of a trade-off for fewer animal housing units? The response will vary according to your present issues and options available.

It’s important to ensure your plan really fits your goals. At times the idea of ​​building or expanding a shelter is simply raising the number of pets or animals raised and having the environment more appealing can lead to huge gains in protecting and saving lives. However, more animal housing space, even better-looking shelters do not lower the chance of euthanasia. Supplementary cages are rather quickly filled, and more attractive facilities sometimes result in the higher intake and higher adoption rates. Most importantly, if the efficiency and quality of the space are not better, even the huge investment in facility expansion may be frustrating.